kinot-2

Rumours

852 posts in this topic

31 minutes ago, kinot-2 said:

FWIW: Koulious (sp?) And Barnaby on NHL radio today said they keep hearing the Habs linked to Ehlers. 

 

31 minutes ago, kinot-2 said:

 

Ehlers would be a great pick-up. I've heard that Winnipeg is looking to deal him for a right-handed D man and that they were talking to Carolina about a swap. Don Wadell has also said his primary goal other than re-signing his goalies is to find scoring help, so the fit between the two teams seems better than with ours. Do we give up Juulsen and a 1st rounder and something else? Not sure what we have that fits what they're rumored to want...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, BigTed3 said:

 

 

Ehlers would be a great pick-up. I've heard that Winnipeg is looking to deal him for a right-handed D man and that they were talking to Carolina about a swap. Don Wadell has also said his primary goal other than re-signing his goalies is to find scoring help, so the fit between the two teams seems better than with ours. Do we give up Juulsen and a 1st rounder and something else? Not sure what we have that fits what they're rumored to want...

I would rather leave them in their mess and get Conner via trade

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, kinot-2 said:

FWIW: Koulious (sp?) And Barnaby on NHL radio today said they keep hearing the Habs linked to Ehlers. 

Articles I read is he's more linked to Carolina and Doug Hamilton ... Jets are looking to replace Trouba on the right side.   Additionally, going for Ehlers makes no sense to me ... he's a Leftwing where we already have Tatar, Drouin, Lehkonen.    He'd be on par with Drouin/Tatar really and we don't need forwards with Poehling, Suzuki and others ready to step in.    We need a quality LD and hopefully that's where MB is focused ... unless ...

Ehlers makes sense only if one of Tatar/Drouin is being discussed for a LD ... most likely Drouin as he's young.   

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, HabsAlways said:

Articles I read is he's more linked to Carolina and Doug Hamilton ... Jets are looking to replace Trouba on the right side.   Additionally, going for Ehlers makes no sense to me ... he's a Leftwing where we already have Tatar, Drouin, Lehkonen.    He'd be on par with Drouin/Tatar really and we don't need forwards with Poehling, Suzuki and others ready to step in.    We need a quality LD and hopefully that's where MB is focused ... unless ...

Ehlers makes sense only if one of Tatar/Drouin is being discussed for a LD ... most likely Drouin as he's young.   

I think if you have the opportunity to pick up a talent like Ehlers at a reasonable price, you do it, regardless of what your depth is like. You can always trade someone.  

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, maas_art said:

I think if you have the opportunity to pick up a talent like Ehlers at a reasonable price, you do it, regardless of what your depth is like. You can always trade someone.  

yeah i agree, Ehlers is too talented, you add him if you can

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RDS and Dreger both reporting that the Leafs have contacted other teams to tell them players are available... they want to trade Kapanen for a D man and Kadri for another center on a lower cap hit. They've also made Conner Brown available. Definitely sounds like they're trying to clear space ASAP to be able to re-sign Marner or at least fend off hostile offers. It also makes you wonder if efforts to trade Marleau and/or Zaitsev have failed if they're moving on to trading guys they'd prefer to keep. Trouble in Leaf-land!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, BigTed3 said:

 Trouble in Leaf-land!

:4322:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, BigTed3 said:

RDS and Dreger both reporting that the Leafs have contacted other teams to tell them players are available... they want to trade Kapanen for a D man and Kadri for another center on a lower cap hit. They've also made Conner Brown available. Definitely sounds like they're trying to clear space ASAP to be able to re-sign Marner or at least fend off hostile offers. It also makes you wonder if efforts to trade Marleau and/or Zaitsev have failed if they're moving on to trading guys they'd prefer to keep. Trouble in Leaf-land!

Too bad we couldn't really take advantage of their situation. I mean, I feel like we don't need or want any of their "cast-off" forwards. I'd love to have Marner, but obviously the mandate is to resign him so they can have THREE forwards with an AAV of $11+ million. And they have no defenders we would be interested in.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, jennifer_rocket said:

the mandate is to resign him so they can have THREE forwards with an AAV of $11+ million. And they have no defenders we would be interested in.

And this is the problem. Remember when the Rumours about Tavares came up & everyone was like "nah, they dont need another centre."   And dont get me wrong, Tavares is an elite talent but when you already have Matthews, Marner and Nylander - not to mention a supporting cast of kadri, kapanen and Johnsson etc can you really afford to sign JT?

This problem was wholly expected and seen by anyone who looked at their cap with just a passing glance, and yet they did nothing.   They've made their bed... 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, BigTed3 said:

RDS and Dreger both reporting that the Leafs have contacted other teams to tell them players are available... they want to trade Kapanen for a D man and Kadri for another center on a lower cap hit. They've also made Conner Brown available. Definitely sounds like they're trying to clear space ASAP to be able to re-sign Marner or at least fend off hostile offers. It also makes you wonder if efforts to trade Marleau and/or Zaitsev have failed if they're moving on to trading guys they'd prefer to keep. Trouble in Leaf-land!

Darren Dreger reported on Twitter Thursday that the Leafs have made it known they will listen to offers for Kasperi Kapanen and Nazem Kadri, while there’s a strong sense that Connor Brown could go as well.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, kinot-2 said:

Darren Dreger reported on Twitter Thursday that the Leafs have made it known they will listen to offers for Kasperi Kapanen and Nazem Kadri, while there’s a strong sense that Connor Brown could go as well.

Pray they get fleeced

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, booboo_mtl said:

Pray they get fleeced

The plot thickens: NHL on NBC analyst Pierre McGuire says that he believes that Mitch Marner will get an offer sheet, and the Leafs will have to decide what to value more; Marner or the four first round draft picks as compensation. :4224:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I almost wonder if the Leafs would take the 4 firsts and run if they got that offer sheet... maybe depends on the team doing it, but if a squad like the Isles or Canucks or Sens came along and signed Marner to an OS, there's still a good chance at least one of those picks could be a lottery pick. You lose Marner, but you solve your cap issues, keep the rest of your team together, and gain 4 potentially-decent 1st rounders. I think the Leafs' problem will be if someone offers Marner 10.5M. Do you match and trade Kadri and Kapanen and lose Gardiner to free agency and decimate your roster? Or do you take two firsts and change, which is probably less than what you'd get in a trade?

As for Tavares, I actually don't think the Leafs made a bad move signing him. They took a shot at a Cup this year, it didn't pan out, but if they beat Boston in round 1, maybe they're champions right now. Even if they lose Marner for 4 firsts, then they've basically replaced Marner with Tavares (who is older but a center) and gained 4 firsts without giving up assets. I still think they're better off with Tavares than without him. If they keep Marner and JT and deal Kadri and Kapanen for peanuts or picks, they've still turned Kadri and Kapanen into Tavares and picks, which remains an upgrade in my view. This illustrates that you can't just buy a roster under the cap and that ongoing drafting success is the key to sustaining a winning team. But I don't think the Tavares signing was a bad move and I'd rather have the problem of having too many elite players than none at all.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope someone comes in with a five year offer of $10.5 million. And Marner signs it. Gets $52.5 million and hits unrestricted free agency at 27 years old. Who knows what the expected payday for someone of Marner's caliber might be in five years from now. I bet he'd be interested in finding out.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BigTed3 said:

I almost wonder if the Leafs would take the 4 firsts and run if they got that offer sheet... maybe depends on the team doing it, but if a squad like the Isles or Canucks or Sens came along and signed Marner to an OS, there's still a good chance at least one of those picks could be a lottery pick. You lose Marner, but you solve your cap issues, keep the rest of your team together, and gain 4 potentially-decent 1st rounders. I think the Leafs' problem will be if someone offers Marner 10.5M. Do you match and trade Kadri and Kapanen and lose Gardiner to free agency and decimate your roster? Or do you take two firsts and change, which is probably less than what you'd get in a trade?

Theoretically you could then turn around and flip one of those 1st rounders to a rebuilding team for a vet too.  There's options.  Id be surprised if they let Marner go but like you said, will depend partially on who makes the offer.

Do you think Marner would sign a deal at $10.5? 

1 hour ago, BigTed3 said:

As for Tavares, I actually don't think the Leafs made a bad move signing him. They took a shot at a Cup this year, it didn't pan out, but if they beat Boston in round 1, maybe they're champions right now. Even if they lose Marner for 4 firsts, then they've basically replaced Marner with Tavares (who is older but a center) and gained 4 firsts without giving up assets. I still think they're better off with Tavares than without him. If they keep Marner and JT and deal Kadri and Kapanen for peanuts or picks, they've still turned Kadri and Kapanen into Tavares and picks, which remains an upgrade in my view. This illustrates that you can't just buy a roster under the cap and that ongoing drafting success is the key to sustaining a winning team. But I don't think the Tavares signing was a bad move and I'd rather have the problem of having too many elite players than none at all.

No question they are better with Tavares than without him but are they better with Tavares than they would be if they'd used that cap space on making their D better?  Not so sure. 

In some ways I guess its like us (less money in play of course) on whether we should sign a guy like Duchene when we already have a ton of good forwards & our real hole is at left d.  

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, maas_art said:

Theoretically you could then turn around and flip one of those 1st rounders to a rebuilding team for a vet too.  There's options.  Id be surprised if they let Marner go but like you said, will depend partially on who makes the offer.

Do you think Marner would sign a deal at $10.5? 

No question they are better with Tavares than without him but are they better with Tavares than they would be if they'd used that cap space on making their D better?  Not so sure. 

In some ways I guess its like us (less money in play of course) on whether we should sign a guy like Duchene when we already have a ton of good forwards & our real hole is at left d.  

1. If you believe the Leaf media, Marner isn't interested in signing an 8-year deal with Toronto. Rumors are that Dubas told Marner he would only give him 11M a year if he was signing for 8 years, and Marner said he doesn't want to go that long. That's a rumor, but if you believe it, then maybe Marner is banking on himself to up his value even further and banking on the cap going up substantially in the future. Like JR pointed out, Marner's also young enough that he can cash in now AND leave himself another chance at signing a long-term deal under the new CBA in the future. So maybe Marner's ideal contract is going higher on money and shorter on term. Maybe he wants 3-5 years at 11-12M. And maybe he's willing to settle for 10.5M if he gets the term he wants. If his options from Toronto are 8 years at 11M or 1 year at 11M, and his options from another team are 3-5 years at 10.56M, so that it keeps the compensation down and gives Marner his UFA status in a few years, then maybe just maybe he bites at that.

 

2. On JT, I think we also have to consider that we don't know what the alternatives were. Just about every team wanted Tavares, and he chose Toronto. Again, I think that's a hard thing to pass up. I don't think signing JT was the problem, I think it was what they did with everything else. Maybe they shouldn't have gone out after Muzzin. Maybe they should have traded Kadri once they signed JT. But they definitely had other options in terms of swapping out other players for a D man. If they had dealt Kadri for Dougie Hamilton, for example, are they not a better team with JT and Hamilton than they are with Kadri and Muzzin? For us, as much as I like the idea of getting Duchene for no assets given up, his potential contract is starting to get out of hand and he's not in the same ballpark as JT talent-wise IMO. But the premise would hold true for me if you could get Duchene for 8.5-9M a season... you can't just do that, but you could sign him and then turn around and trade a Drouin for a LHD and I think we'd be better off doing something like that than not signing Duchene...

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, BigTed3 said:

On JT, I think we also have to consider that we don't know what the alternatives were. Just about every team wanted Tavares, and he chose Toronto. Again, I think that's a hard thing to pass up. I don't think signing JT was the problem, I think it was what they did with everything else. Maybe they shouldn't have gone out after Muzzin. Maybe they should have traded Kadri once they signed JT. But they definitely had other options in terms of swapping out other players for a D man. If they had dealt Kadri for Dougie Hamilton, for example, are they not a better team with JT and Hamilton than they are with Kadri and Muzzin? For us, as much as I like the idea of getting Duchene for no assets given up, his potential contract is starting to get out of hand and he's not in the same ballpark as JT talent-wise IMO. But the premise would hold true for me if you could get Duchene for 8.5-9M a season... you can't just do that, but you could sign him and then turn around and trade a Drouin for a LHD and I think we'd be better off doing something like that than not signing Duchene...

 

I agree the problem wasn't he fact they signed Tavares, it was what they did after they signed Tavares. They had options to move Kadri, They had options to move Nylander. With Tavares and Mathews, They probably have one of the best one two punch in the NHL. And then next to that top wave you have Marner and Oreilly. 

Its like going into the draft you take the best player available and work from there. One of the best players in the game fell into their lap, it would have been an even bigger mistake not to take him. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah I still think they should move Nylander, I don't know what they are doing

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, habsisme said:

yeah I still think they should move Nylander, I don't know what they are doing

Nylander should have been moved last year before he tanked. Probably could have got the D-man they need. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, BigTed3 said:

This illustrates that you can't just buy a roster under the cap and that ongoing drafting success is the key to sustaining a winning team. 

I feel like this is the old way of thinking there was an article on sportsnet yesterday that outlined the exact opposite stating when you draft and develop multiple star players in the cap system you have a team of superstars all worth 8-11 mil like the Leafs where as if you trade for other teams players or sign FA you control the amount you spend on tallent. That's how the Blues won the cup this year they don't have many players they actually drafted and built a strong defensive team through trades.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, campabee82 said:

I feel like this is the old way of thinking there was an article on sportsnet yesterday that outlined the exact opposite stating when you draft and develop multiple star players in the cap system you have a team of superstars all worth 8-11 mil like the Leafs where as if you trade for other teams players or sign FA you control the amount you spend on tallent. That's how the Blues won the cup this year they don't have many players they actually drafted and built a strong defensive team through trades.

i think it still starts with good drafting. And you're unlikely to hit a home run every time, hopefully you get a couple of doubles and singles too

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, campabee82 said:

I feel like this is the old way of thinking there was an article on sportsnet yesterday that outlined the exact opposite stating when you draft and develop multiple star players in the cap system you have a team of superstars all worth 8-11 mil like the Leafs where as if you trade for other teams players or sign FA you control the amount you spend on tallent. That's how the Blues won the cup this year they don't have many players they actually drafted and built a strong defensive team through trades.

Not sure who said they didn't draft their own players...

- David Perron, 1st round 2007 (even though he's come and gone)

- Alex Pietrangelo, 1st round 2008

- Jake Allen, 2nd round 2008

- Jaden Schwartz, 1st round 2010

- Vladimir Tarasenko, 1st round 2010

- Joel Edmundson, 2nd round 2011

- Jordan Binnington, 3rd round 2011

- Jordan Schmaltz, 1st round 2012

- Mackenzie MacEachern, 3rd round 2012

- Colton Parayko, 3rd round 2012

- Robby Fabbri, 1st round 2014

- Ivan Barbashev, 2nd round 2014

- Sammy Blais, 6th round 2014

- Vince Dunn, 2nd round 2015

- Jordan Kyrou, 2nd round 2016

- Robert Thomas, 1st round 2017

 

So I'd argue they have a fair number of their own draft picks who played for them this season and a good number of those who played significant roles. Further to that, they hit on a lot of their first round picks and in years when they didn't have first round picks, they hit on their 2nd rounders... they absolutely supplemented their roster with a few key pick-ups like O'Reilly and Schenn and so on, but their core was drafted for the most part. The point remains that they didn't simply build their roster by trades and free agency alone, and they have some cost-controlled contributors like Binnington, Dun, Thomas, and so on who allowed them to build their roster.

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, BigTed3 said:

Not sure who said they didn't draft their own players...

- David Perron, 1st round 2007 (even though he's come and gone)

- Alex Pietrangelo, 1st round 2008

- Jake Allen, 2nd round 2008

- Jaden Schwartz, 1st round 2010

- Vladimir Tarasenko, 1st round 2010

- Joel Edmundson, 2nd round 2011

- Jordan Binnington, 3rd round 2011

- Jordan Schmaltz, 1st round 2012

- Mackenzie MacEachern, 3rd round 2012

- Colton Parayko, 3rd round 2012

- Robby Fabbri, 1st round 2014

- Ivan Barbashev, 2nd round 2014

- Sammy Blais, 6th round 2014

- Vince Dunn, 2nd round 2015

- Jordan Kyrou, 2nd round 2016

- Robert Thomas, 1st round 2017

 

So I'd argue they have a fair number of their own draft picks who played for them this season and a good number of those who played significant roles. Further to that, they hit on a lot of their first round picks and in years when they didn't have first round picks, they hit on their 2nd rounders... they absolutely supplemented their roster with a few key pick-ups like O'Reilly and Schenn and so on, but their core was drafted for the most part. The point remains that they didn't simply build their roster by trades and free agency alone, and they have some cost-controlled contributors like Binnington, Dun, Thomas, and so on who allowed them to build their roster.

 

The Blues also don't have those 11-12 million "superstars" that all teams and fans want. I would also say even though they did win the cup this season I would be very surprised if next pre-season they are the cup favorite. You do have to have the correct combination. So going after the superstar players (which fans love) isn't always the answer. It's great to have game breakers and flashy players that can bring you out of your seat , but a solid roster of team players is great also. I would rather have strong depth than 3 or 4 superstars that ate all the cap room and not enough depth around them. That is where the tough balance of entry level mid level contracts that all can contribute comes into play. In the cap era the Hawks probably come the closest to have had a dynasty 3 cups 6 years. Pitts 2 in 3 years.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With Dubas putting it out there that he won't commit to matching any offer sheets to his players,,, that pretty much opens up the door for GM's to seriously consider one this year. If MB believes this is our window,,, then he needs to throw his hat in there on Marner. Even if it costs us those 1st rounders, i would expect a guy like Marner makes us a playoff team, seriously reducing any chance of those being lottery picks.

Five years at whatever it takes.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BigTed3 said:

Not sure who said they didn't draft their own players...

- David Perron, 1st round 2007 (even though he's come and gone)

- Alex Pietrangelo, 1st round 2008

- Jake Allen, 2nd round 2008

- Jaden Schwartz, 1st round 2010

- Vladimir Tarasenko, 1st round 2010

- Joel Edmundson, 2nd round 2011

- Jordan Binnington, 3rd round 2011

- Jordan Schmaltz, 1st round 2012

- Mackenzie MacEachern, 3rd round 2012

- Colton Parayko, 3rd round 2012

- Robby Fabbri, 1st round 2014

- Ivan Barbashev, 2nd round 2014

- Sammy Blais, 6th round 2014

- Vince Dunn, 2nd round 2015

- Jordan Kyrou, 2nd round 2016

- Robert Thomas, 1st round 2017

 

So I'd argue they have a fair number of their own draft picks who played for them this season and a good number of those who played significant roles. Further to that, they hit on a lot of their first round picks and in years when they didn't have first round picks, they hit on their 2nd rounders... they absolutely supplemented their roster with a few key pick-ups like O'Reilly and Schenn and so on, but their core was drafted for the most part. The point remains that they didn't simply build their roster by trades and free agency alone, and they have some cost-controlled contributors like Binnington, Dun, Thomas, and so on who allowed them to build their roster.

 

I will post the article if I can find it again but didn't realize the Blues had that many players they drafted. I agree the draft is important but you can't solely rely on building through the draft was my point but have to use every tool available whether it's the draft, FA, Offersheets or trades to build your team.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now