kinot-2

Rumours

975 posts in this topic

55 minutes ago, H_T_L said:

Just an added note to the above. There`s no way i consider Gardiner to be better then Petry, so i don`t see him instantly becoming our number 2 guy ,,,, unless you were talking about Weber and i don`t see that either.

Well Webber is our #1 in the eyes of the guy's that run the show so he would slot in next to him.he would not be my #1 choice either but the fact is the clock is ticking and like i said unless our fearless leader can pull of some trade miracle he is the best option out there so in my opinion get it done and stop wasting our and our players time and careers. obviously our doctors would have to check him out i don't think this has been a chronic issue  but once again we can't wait for a player we may never even see either! i think Petry is about on par with Gardiner but rank the d men as 1-2 fist pairing 3-4 second pairing and 5-6 third pairing so to me that would make Gardiner #2 as you would most likely see him with Webber. if there is a better plan that would see us with a top pairing D starting the season with us next year i am all ears.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

For the sanity of all of us Hab fans I would say we ban the word RUMOUR from this forum. What's the point in rumours when it comes to this club anyways? It is like me being rumored to be 6 feet tall ever new year and still be 5'6" tall.....

Edited by habby67
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, habby67 said:

For the sanity of all of us Hab fans I would say we ban the word RUMOUR from this forum. What's the point in rumours when it comes to this club anyways? It is like me being rumored to be 6 feet tall ever new year and still be 5'6" tall.....

I guess we "could" call it the "gossip" Thread. :P

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, kinot-2 said:

I guess we "could" call it the "gossip" Thread. :P

 

So sick of every summer hoping we have a chance of acquiring someone of significance.Blah..........

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just be happy most of them do not come true. Otherwise we would be up against the cap and over paying either Lee or Dzingel. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

On 7/12/2019 at 8:00 PM, habby67 said:

So sick of every summer hoping we have a chance of acquiring someone of significance.Blah..........

Such as?   For the most part UFA signings do not work out well for the team who signed them.    You're usually getting a guy who is older, had a career year they will never reproduce and is now tying up a roster spot and cap space you could use better.     I saw an article the other day that backed it up with stats, that showed that 9 out of 10 UFA signings are essentially a waste of cap space and the player never produces to the value of the contract.

The modern Salary Cap NHL requires you develop the majority of your talent through the draft, with a constant stream of talent to fill out your top 9, the occasional trade and perhaps a free agent.    Outside of John Tavares last summer, there has been nobody of "significance" as a UFA since the new CBA started in 2013.    Despite leafs signing John Tavares and creating cap problems for themsleves, they bowed out in the first round.

Think the oilers are happy with Lucic? Boston with Backes? Isles with Ladd?  Nucks with Ericksson?

Sure its easy in hindsight to call those 4 teams stupid for signing those guys to those contracts ... but at the time, they were all legit top 6 or 9 forwards that many teams pursued.

Edited by HabsAlways
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, HabsAlways said:

Such as?   For the most part UFA signings do not work out well for the team who signed them.    You're usually getting a guy who is older, had a career year they will never reproduce and is now tying up a roster spot and cap space you could use better.     I saw an article the other day that backed it up with stats, that showed that 9 out of 10 UFA signings are essentially a waste of cap space and the player never produces to the value of the contract.

The modern Salary Cap NHL requires you develop the majority of your talent through the draft, with a constant stream of talent to fill out your top 9, the occasional trade and perhaps a free agent.    Outside of John Tavares last summer, there has been nobody of "significance" as a UFA since the new CBA started in 2013.    Despite leafs signing John Tavares and creating cap problems for themsleves, they bowed out in the first round.

Think the oilers are happy with Lucic? Boston with Backes? Isles with Ladd?  Nucks with Ericksson?

Sure its easy in hindsight to call those 4 teams stupid for signing those guys to those contracts ... but at the time, they were all legit top 6 or 9 forwards that many teams pursued.

I disagree if you don't do your homework and know your own team then yes the FA signing a don't always work out. However if you do know your team and what it needs and who would best fill that need then you do get the player and term you want and the value you seek. It's like anything else in the world if you know what you have and what you need you can get better but if you get what you want and not what you need you risk being burned.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, HabsAlways said:

Such as?   For the most part UFA signings do not work out well for the team who signed them.    You're usually getting a guy who is older, had a career year they will never reproduce and is now tying up a roster spot and cap space you could use better.     I saw an article the other day that backed it up with stats, that showed that 9 out of 10 UFA signings are essentially a waste of cap space and the player never produces to the value of the contract.

The modern Salary Cap NHL requires you develop the majority of your talent through the draft, with a constant stream of talent to fill out your top 9, the occasional trade and perhaps a free agent.    Outside of John Tavares last summer, there has been nobody of "significance" as a UFA since the new CBA started in 2013.    Despite leafs signing John Tavares and creating cap problems for themsleves, they bowed out in the first round.

Think the oilers are happy with Lucic? Boston with Backes? Isles with Ladd?  Nucks with Ericksson?

Sure its easy in hindsight to call those 4 teams stupid for signing those guys to those contracts ... but at the time, they were all legit top 6 or 9 forwards that many teams pursued.

I agree, no offence camp, but lets keep going in the right direction. I think we have arguably one of the best prospects pools in the league. Stay away from those big free agent signings. We already got burned by alzner. Lots of talent here to go the trade route for our needs and this is the brightest I've seen this teams future look in a long while.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, xxdocxx said:

I agree, no offence camp, but lets keep going in the right direction. I think we have arguably one of the best prospects pools in the league. Stay away from those big free agent signings. We already got burned by alzner. Lots of talent here to go the trade route for our needs and this is the brightest I've seen this teams future look in a long while.

I wasn't saying that you should just focus on FA. For sure you should have a steady stream of prospects but you also have to know your team and what their actual needs are and what is available to fill those needs before dipping into FA. I don't think you should add through FA just to add a skilled forward if you already have skilled forwards and you need a left D or sign a 4th line winger if you need a pure goal scorer just cause you struck out with an Offersheet. Personally of the FA we signed and what was available for their respective prices I like the Kinkade signing I like that we passed on Duchene at 9 MIL or whatever it was and I am intriguing at the Chiarot signing as it could mean MB is working on a trade. But the Cousins signing wasn't my favorite and if Chiarot was MB'S solution for the LD then that's not acceptable to me. I would rather allow Suzuki or Evans or Poehling to take the spot Cousins is going to and just have rolled with the D we had last season if Chiarot is supposed to be the solution cause he won't be. My point is the FA signings aren't a solution to all a teams problems but a tool to improve a team IF that team actually signs the right peice at the right price. I feel like a Max. contract similar to what the NBA uses may help with the rediculous contracts we are seeing right now. I would like to see something along the lines of 5 years and 10-12% cap hit is the max a player can sign for with a resigning team still getting a 6th year. Plus get rid of the RFA contracts altogether let the players and teams decide who to sign and where they want to go.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, xxdocxx said:

I agree, no offence camp, but lets keep going in the right direction. I think we have arguably one of the best prospects pools in the league. Stay away from those big free agent signings. We already got burned by alzner. Lots of talent here to go the trade route for our needs and this is the brightest I've seen this teams future look in a long while.

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

   Geez I couldn't agree more with this assessment ….unless there's a Laine down the road via trade for a reasonable outlay ( given his inconsistent defensive play )  I can't see losing the momentum of what appears to be a decent pipeline of prospects with more coming next year ...my feeling is the staff will take a hard look at training camp because that is an unknown ..KK will be better , Poehling might make the team and for all we know Suzuki ...Montreal has capable d -men in the system that can step up and Juulsen if he can stay healthy is another plus ...in today's NHL with its cap considerations you better have a good pool of prospects or you're dead in the water and Montreal is trending in the right direction from what I see 

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, campabee82 said:

I disagree if you don't do your homework and know your own team then yes the FA signing a don't always work out. However if you do know your team and what it needs and who would best fill that need then you do get the player and term you want and the value you seek. It's like anything else in the world if you know what you have and what you need you can get better but if you get what you want and not what you need you risk being burned.

Sure, but in the last say decade ... I'd say 2/3rds of all UFA signings for all teams did NOT work out so well in hindsight.   If you look at the teams who are going deep in the playoffs lately, they've all been built through the draft and key trades here and there.    Its rare that a UFA has a major impact for their new team, there are exceptions yes, but generally you're getting somebody in the decline of their career.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, HabsAlways said:

Sure, but in the last say decade ... I'd say 2/3rds of all UFA signings for all teams did NOT work out so well in hindsight.   If you look at the teams who are going deep in the playoffs lately, they've all been built through the draft and key trades here and there.    Its rare that a UFA has a major impact for their new team, there are exceptions yes, but generally you're getting somebody in the decline of their career.

Ok that I will agree with most FA signings don't live up to expectations. My question though is, is that cause the player was declining or cause he wasn't the right fit in the system? I would tend to say that it's cause the GM thought he had a handle on what his teams needs were but was wrong cause you see lots of FA signings that don't work but then the player is traded and he excels with the new team cause he fits better in that system 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, HabsAlways said:

Sure, but in the last say decade ... I'd say 2/3rds of all UFA signings for all teams did NOT work out so well in hindsight.   If you look at the teams who are going deep in the playoffs lately, they've all been built through the draft and key trades here and there.    Its rare that a UFA has a major impact for their new team, there are exceptions yes, but generally you're getting somebody in the decline of their career.

absolutely i agree

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, campabee82 said:

I wasn't saying that you should just focus on FA. For sure you should have a steady stream of prospects but you also have to know your team and what their actual needs are and what is available to fill those needs before dipping into FA. I don't think you should add through FA just to add a skilled forward if you already have skilled forwards and you need a left D or sign a 4th line winger if you need a pure goal scorer just cause you struck out with an Offersheet. Personally of the FA we signed and what was available for their respective prices I like the Kinkade signing I like that we passed on Duchene at 9 MIL or whatever it was and I am intriguing at the Chiarot signing as it could mean MB is working on a trade. But the Cousins signing wasn't my favorite and if Chiarot was MB'S solution for the LD then that's not acceptable to me. I would rather allow Suzuki or Evans or Poehling to take the spot Cousins is going to and just have rolled with the D we had last season if Chiarot is supposed to be the solution cause he won't be. My point is the FA signings aren't a solution to all a teams problems but a tool to improve a team IF that team actually signs the right peice at the right price. I feel like a Max. contract similar to what the NBA uses may help with the rediculous contracts we are seeing right now. I would like to see something along the lines of 5 years and 10-12% cap hit is the max a player can sign for with a resigning team still getting a 6th year. Plus get rid of the RFA contracts altogether let the players and teams decide who to sign and where they want to go.

Sorry man maybe i took your quote the wrong way.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, arpem-can said:

 

 

3 hours ago, campabee82 said:

Ok that I will agree with most FA signings don't live up to expectations. My question though is, is that cause the player was declining or cause he wasn't the right fit in the system? I would tend to say that it's cause the GM thought he had a handle on what his teams needs were but was wrong cause you see lots of FA signings that don't work but then the player is traded and he excels with the new team cause he fits better in that system 

All I can say is AMEN MAN. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, arpem-can said:

   Geez I couldn't agree more with this assessment ….unless there's a Laine down the road via trade for a reasonable outlay ( given his inconsistent defensive play )  I can't see losing the momentum of what appears to be a decent pipeline of prospects with more coming next year ...my feeling is the staff will take a hard look at training camp because that is an unknown ..KK will be better , Poehling might make the team and for all we know Suzuki ...Montreal has capable d -men in the system that can step up and Juulsen if he can stay healthy is another plus ...in today's NHL with its cap considerations you better have a good pool of prospects or you're dead in the water and Montreal is trending in the right direction from what I see 

 

Pure speculation. Those D-men are unproven at the NHL level. If they were ready there was no need to sign Chiarot.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, habs1952 said:

Pure speculation. Those D-men are unproven at the NHL level. If they were ready there was no need to sign Chiarot.

   I think there are a couple of  guys in the system that can step up in a 5th or 6th spot ( it's not like I expect them to be top 2 pairings if called upon ) and right now there's a bit of a log jam on d  for the Habs anyway ...I think Chiarot was  an upgrade with more NHL experience will add more grit to the front of the net while his numbers are about the same as Benn  ….there weren't that many LHD available unless you count Gardiner at twice the money and term plus a suspect back ….I'm waiting for the camp to see how this unfolds ...maybe Bergevin with some room will pull the trigger on something more significant with teams in a cap crunch ...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, arpem-can said:

   I think there are a couple of  guys in the system that can step up in a 5th or 6th spot ( it's not like I expect them to be top 2 pairings if called upon ) and right now there's a bit of a log jam on d  for the Habs anyway ...I think Chiarot was  an upgrade with more NHL experience will add more grit to the front of the net while his numbers are about the same as Benn  ….there weren't that many LHD available unless you count Gardiner at twice the money and term plus a suspect back ….I'm waiting for the camp to see how this unfolds ...maybe Bergevin with some room will pull the trigger on something more significant with teams in a cap crunch ...

there is a log jam on the right not the left.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, arpem-can said:

   I think there are a couple of  guys in the system that can step up in a 5th or 6th spot ( it's not like I expect them to be top 2 pairings if called upon ) and right now there's a bit of a log jam on d  for the Habs anyway

who ?

Unless someone has a stand out camp the D are Weber, Petry, Chiarot, Mete, Folin, Kulak, Reilly

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, ramcharger440 said:

there is a log jam on the right not the left.

There's actually a log-jam on both sides.  On the right we have our two best dmen (currently) and 3 of our top 4 defensive prospects as well as some decent depth guys. We're super solid at RD.

On the left we have probably 6-7 guys who could make the nhl roster on most teams. Unfortunately the majority of them would be the 3rd pair on most teams.  We have a couple of guys who can be second pair players - especially when matched with a guy like Petry - and then we have a whole bunch of nothing when it comes to #1D    So we're definitely log-jammed at both sides of the defense, but with a huge hole right at the top of LD.   We have lots of quantity - and some decent quality - at LD but missing that most important piece. 

I think the hope right now is that Mete will take another step forward or that a guy like Leskinen will surprise, but i sure would prefer going into the season with more than a hope. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its Eklund so, you know, grain (or even pound) of salt but since there's not many rumours out there:

 

2 hours ago, eklund said:

The Canadiens aren't done. Not by a long shot... This morning again two more reports, from sources I have known for years, who are telling me the Habs are looking around the NHL to add some star power and targeting two players....

Mainly Patrick Laine. ”Laine could be an offer sheet as early as tomorrow," one source continued, "it is far from a secret both sides have connected and talked contract..."

 

Laine is an interesting case among the RFA's after he struggled so much last season and found himself in the doghouse in a contract year....This has the Jets more than a bit nervous to go hog wild with term. Montreal could really put the Jets into a bad spot and the Jets know it. Montreal doesn't want to give up all the draft picks in an offer sheet so trade talk becomes inevitable..

 

The Canadiens also continue to talk to the Flyers regarding a d-man...The name that was coming up two weeks ago has changed...Then it looked like Gostisbehere was the key component, but now that has shifted to Travis Sanheim...

 

More to come including a Rumor hart update with the RFA signing percentages updated

 

I feel like there's probably some truth to the fact we've talked about Laine (although I dont think MB would offersheet him).   As for Sanheim - obviously id be ecstatic, but i just dont see Philly trading him.  Ghost maybe but sanheim? Cant see it. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, maas_art said:

Its Eklund so, you know, grain (or even pound) of salt but since there's not many rumours out there:

 

I feel like there's probably some truth to the fact we've talked about Laine (although I dont think MB would offersheet him).   As for Sanheim - obviously id be ecstatic, but i just dont see Philly trading him.  Ghost maybe but sanheim? Cant see it. 

Would much rather have Sanheim than Ghost , IMO Lainie is overrated. He's too much of a one dimensional player to me for what he probably wants to get paid and what you'd have to give up for him. He did end up in the dog house a bit with the Jets because when he wasn't scoring his effort really wasn't there, and that was in a 'contract year".

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, CaptWelly said:

Would much rather have Sanheim than Ghost , IMO Lainie is overrated. He's too much of a one dimensional player to me for what he probably wants to get paid and what you'd have to give up for him. He did end up in the dog house a bit with the Jets because when he wasn't scoring his effort really wasn't there, and that was in a 'contract year".

Agree, Sanheim is like, the dream - but then thats probably why its unlikely. I will say one thing for Eklund - in the past anyway - he has had good intel from the Pennsylvania based teams. He's often called things for both the flyers and the pens that no one else did & he was right so lets hope this is a case where he actually knows something because imho either (but especially Sanheim) would be a great addition. 

As for Laine, the worry i have is that he really is not a "Claude Julien" type player.  Its clear Claude wants 200 ft players & while i think Laine may be one of the top 5 best pure goal scorers in the NHl, as you mentioned the rest of his game - at least to this point in his career - leaves a lot to be desired.   Last year he had 30 goals.  He was a BEAST in November, scoring 18 of them.  The rest of the year he scored a total of 12 and was, as you said, often in the dog house. 

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, maas_art said:

Agree, Sanheim is like, the dream - but then thats probably why its unlikely. I will say one thing for Eklund - in the past anyway - he has had good intel from the Pennsylvania based teams. He's often called things for both the flyers and the pens that no one else did & he was right so lets hope this is a case where he actually knows something because imho either (but especially Sanheim) would be a great addition. 

As for Laine, the worry i have is that he really is not a "Claude Julien" type player.  Its clear Claude wants 200 ft players & while i think Laine may be one of the top 5 best pure goal scorers in the NHl, as you mentioned the rest of his game - at least to this point in his career - leaves a lot to be desired.   Last year he had 30 goals.  He was a BEAST in November, scoring 18 of them.  The rest of the year he scored a total of 12 and was, as you said, often in the dog house. 

 

My issue is the same as it is with most trade scenarios.  I would much rather be patient with the young guys we have (Seeing how we just got an elite sniper of the future potentially in Caufield)  rather than subract futures for a short term solution.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.