Jump to content
The Official Site of the Montréal Canadiens
Canadiens de Montreal

8 Mike Komisarek 06-07


jl-1

Recommended Posts

Guest habinto
CITATION(habinto @ Jun 13 2007, 05:10 PM) *

He's expected to be 7 feet tall and 300 pounds in about 2 years.

LOL

TRADE KOMISAREK and (6th round pick) for Chris philips

Komi as yet to reach his full potential, he has leadership qualities and he is big and likes to hit. No rush to move this guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest GDECHANTAL

chris pronger did some filling out ,and like pronger,mike should get alittle bigger and stronger,which will give him more confidence ,and he still learning the nhl game ,philip's has peeked and is now on the down side ,he did not make a in the finals ,so why trade a young player like mike to ottawa for philipps ,crazy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest overlords

Moving komi would be one of the biggest mistakes the CH could do right about now. We've been looking for a strong solid defenseman for so long and we finally have on and he's cheap. He doesn't fight much but when he does he's fearless. AND he's young. What more could we ask from this guy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest HabSteve
That's a good signing for a young player who logs lots of minutes against very tough players night after night. Now let's try to forget the fact that this year Komisarek is STILL making less than Bouillon or Dandenault, who play on the third pairing. Arg.

when you look at it this way, it hurts. Talk about an expensive pairing...

The english news is now on TSN for those who want it

http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=210913&hubname=

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest P.Royfan
Looks like big Komi and Higgins just got signed to 2 year deal!

I would have hoped for 3 or 4 years, but it's good news!

http://www.canadiens.com/eng/news/redirect...newsItemID=5970

According to RDS, Komi will get 1.5 for the first year and 1.9 the second

http://www.rds.ca/canadien/chroniques/231089.html

That's nice that's only going to be a 1.7 cap hit for the next 2 season!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a good signing for a young player who logs lots of minutes against very tough players night after night. Now let's try to forget the fact that this year Komisarek is STILL making less than Bouillon or Dandenault, who play on the third pairing. Arg.

I did forget about it until you mentioned :angry: thanks alot :P

2 years? I'd prefer to have him for 3-4 but its better then a one year deal. Plus if Komi keeps improving his overall game like he did this year I could see them extending it down the stretch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest P.Royfan
I did forget about it until you mentioned :angry: thanks alot :P

2 years? I'd prefer to have him for 3-4 but its better then a one year deal. Plus if Komi keeps improving his overall game like he did this year I could see them extending it down the stretch

If he had of signe a longer term it would have ment more $$$$

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he had of signe a longer term it would have ment more $$$$

more money in the long run but if it was a contract like Markovs where the cap hit is the same each year I'd be very happy to pay him 1.5 million a year for 3 years ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest P.Royfan
more money in the long run but if it was a contract like Markovs where the cap hit is the same each year I'd be very happy to pay him 1.5 million a year for 3 years ;)

That's not what I ment to keep him under contract for a longer time would have ment having to pay him more than 1.5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Miltie01
I too would have preferred to see him signed to a 3-4 year deal as I think he will only get better.

I myself would tend to think the player did not want a longer term as, like you feel, he will get better and be able to get more money.

There is no reason for him to lock in for four years, unless of coarse Bob was willing to take a risk and pay more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...