Habcup Posted November 6, 2008 Report Share Posted November 6, 2008 I don't like what Brisebois brings to the roster. IMO he should have retired. For fans to say that Brisebois had a solid or good game against the Wild were not watching the game or looking at the stats after the game. A huge chuck of the game was either on PP or PK. Brisebois is supposed to be good on the PP. One point in 8 games. The PP sucks pond water. Brisebois is on the PP therefore IMO he is part of the PP problem. Brisebois did not play on the PK so how good of a defenceman is he? Gorges was on the PK for over 8 minutes and he is just a young player learning the game. Brisebois is the veteran with 17 years experience, shouldn't he be on the PK? I want Weber to get a chance in Montreal because the PP is not working. Without a big shot from the point it is too easy for the PK to stop the Montreal forwards. Weber would bring a top calibre shot to the PP. Given that Brisebois does not play on the PK the same situation could occur with Weber. I would rather have Dandenault on the defence then Brisebois. That is how impressed I am with Brisebois. I agree with your evaluation of Breez.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.