Kronixx Posted November 3, 2008 Report Share Posted November 3, 2008 http://watch.tsn.ca/nhl/clip108437#clip108437 doesnt st louis stop goin in a forward motion when he revert to skating forward in this clip he moves sideways 100% no forward movement even auld complains should this type of shootout goal count as in the rule book it stats u have to keep a forward motion at all times or youre shot does not count Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kronixx Posted November 3, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 3, 2008 did i see wrong? no one has any feed back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmash Posted November 3, 2008 Report Share Posted November 3, 2008 looked like he always had forward momentum to me, he was never moving 100% sideways Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 3, 2008 Report Share Posted November 3, 2008 I saw no problem with it,,, as both the puck and his skates continued to move towards the net. Neat goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreekHockeyCoach Posted November 3, 2008 Report Share Posted November 3, 2008 I saw no problem with it,,, as both the puck and his skates continued to move towards the net. Neat goal. Same here, I saw no problem with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Innis_Mor Posted November 3, 2008 Report Share Posted November 3, 2008 looked like he always had forward momentum to me, he was never moving 100% sidewaysYup, agree. On super-super-super slow-mo, he's still inching forward. That counts! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RicochetII Posted November 3, 2008 Report Share Posted November 3, 2008 I can see the argument, but I don't think anything was wrong with it. I'd prefer it was a timed event anyway, it would allow more creativity, but keep the limit short enough so it has to be fairly quick and exciting. Allow things like body fakes and wraparounds, for example. Actually, thinking about it, that would add entertainment but detract from the validity as it would make it difficult on the goaltenders. Maybe timed for the skills competition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King-Carey-31 Posted November 3, 2008 Report Share Posted November 3, 2008 no problem with it, perfectly legal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FirstStar Posted November 4, 2008 Report Share Posted November 4, 2008 I can see the argument, but I don't think anything was wrong with it. I'd prefer it was a timed event anyway, it would allow more creativity, but keep the limit short enough so it has to be fairly quick and exciting. Allow things like body fakes and wraparounds, for example. Actually, thinking about it, that would add entertainment but detract from the validity as it would make it difficult on the goaltenders. Maybe timed for the skills competition. Just so I understand what you're trying to say... Instead of skating towards the net and trying to score in one fluid motion like they're doing. You believe the skater should have (let's say) 10 seconds to score, meaning he can pick up his own rebound, as long as it's done within the 10 second marker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kronixx Posted November 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 5, 2008 ok glad to have feedback to me it looked like he was goin sideways for a split second if u ask me thats a suckers shootout goal kind of cheap but if it counts good for him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leafs_rock_go_mccabe Posted November 6, 2008 Report Share Posted November 6, 2008 What I don't understand is dudes being able to come in, and do the spin-o-rama on a goaltender, basically ending up in their crease, feet first, totally interferring with the goaltenders abaility to position himself in the net. That is silly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.